We have seen how simple portfolio theory explains the relationship between risk and returns. For example, the representation below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255e6/255e6672333b62adcf1d7b1dfe78b015dea1dbfa" alt=""
This leads to the development of what is known as the Capital Market Line (CML). CML is a concept that combines the risk-free asset and the market portfolio. It is the line connecting the risk-free return and tangent to the ‘efficient frontier’ of the portfolio.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d86b/7d86b0d135e7ef5c44dfe1227294a720a61a06d4" alt=""
The slope of the Capital Market Line (CML) is the Sharpe Ratio of the portfolio.
Sharpe Ratio = (Return of the portfolio – risk-free rate) / Standard deviation
But there is something wrong with this line – or at least how people perceive the line of risk vs return. That is, next.