See a game played between two rational players with the following payoff matrix.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/869d9/869d93fc3c283c83773453fcfd45e80e6a97b4c9" alt=""
Looking at the matrix, one can see that player 2 is unlikely to choose the right strategy as her payoffs, 3, 2 and -1, are worse off against left and centre. So for player 2, the matrix is the following.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c90/64c909b381bc1550925be80136b236537f61b036" alt=""
Player 1 knows what Player 2 is thinking because she is also rational. She looks at her options and concludes that down is no longer an option for her (- 1 < 4 and 2 < 3). So he eliminates the row corresponding to down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2285d/2285de6bf429a535a1e6e36945d29a41495fb794" alt=""
Player 2 knows that the option down is the least favourite to Player 1, so she compares options left and centre. Centre dominates (4 > 3 and 3 > 1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe8b2/fe8b20c8004ed48d8272d71f47e5c6ffd7dfa2f5" alt=""
If that is the case, Player 1 will choose the middle, which gives her a better incentive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b500/8b5002faad9a179816d442471e58d93b7e953c14" alt=""
The whole game structure is common knowledge between the two players. Such games are known as iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies or IESDS.